How should new and eliminated ABBs be represented in the Gap Analysis matrix?

In the Gap Analysis matrix, incorporating a final row labeled 'New' and a final column labeled 'Eliminated' allows for a clear and structured representation of changes in Architecture Building Blocks (ABBs). This approach effectively organizes the information, making it easy to identify which ABBs are newly introduced and which have been eliminated within the context of the analysis.

Positioning new ABBs in a separate row distinctly highlights their addition to the architecture, while the column for eliminated ABBs clearly marks those that are no longer part of the architecture landscape. This visual distinction aids stakeholders in quickly understanding the impact of architectural changes and facilitates discussions around the evolution of the architecture.

Other methods, such as using colored fonts or arrows, may provide visual markers but can complicate the matrix if used excessively or inconsistently. Documenting new and eliminated ABBs separately from the matrix could lead to fragmentation of information, making it less accessible for stakeholders who rely on a comprehensive view for decision-making processes. Overall, the method of adding designated sections within the matrix promotes clarity, consistency, and ease of analysis.