In TOGAF Phase G, compliance is assessed in which two areas?

In TOGAF Phase G, which focuses on the governance of architecture implementation, compliance is assessed primarily in terms of the scope of the project and its actual implementation.

Evaluating the scope ensures that the project aligns with the planned architecture outputs and meets the defined business goals and requirements. It involves confirming that what was intended to be achieved (the architecture vision and scope) matches what is actually being delivered in terms of functionalities and capabilities.

The assessment of actual implementation pertains to checking that the deployment of the architecture follows the defined guidelines, principles, and design specifications. This alignment helps ensure that what has been implemented truly reflects the architectural standards and satisfies stakeholder needs.

By focusing on both the scope and the actual implementation, TOGAF ensures that the governance process can validate that the project remains on track and adheres to its architectural objectives, thereby maintaining quality and integrity.

The other options do not accurately reflect the areas focused on in Phase G. Quality metrics and project scope mix different evaluation criteria, while architecture documentation and budget adherence touch upon aspects outside the primary compliance focus during governance. The emphasis is squarely on ensuring the project aligns with its original architectural intent—both in scope and execution.