What happens when separate projects conduct their own ADM cycles concurrently?

When multiple projects conduct their own Architecture Development Method (ADM) cycles concurrently, one notable outcome is that one project may instigate the initiation of another. This is largely because the projects often share common goals, resources, or dependencies. When one project identifies a need or opportunity that could benefit from the expertise, findings, or resources of another, it may lead to the initiation of a new project that aims to address this identified requirement.

Additionally, in an enterprise environment, various projects are typically interlinked, and the insights or results from one project can highlight gaps or opportunities for other projects, fostering collaboration and potentially leading to new initiatives. This interconnectedness is a significant factor in aligning the projects strategically within the organization.

The other options suggest scenarios that do not necessarily reflect the dynamic nature of concurrent ADM cycles. For instance, the idea that there is minimal interaction between the projects overlooks the collaborative opportunities and interdependencies that often arise. Similarly, there is no strict requirement that all projects align their timelines, as this could lead to inefficiencies. Finally, while independent cycles may incur costs, the potential for one project to inspire another typically serves to enhance strategic alignment rather than merely escalating costs.