What is the outcome of each ADM cycle concerning the Architecture Landscape?

The appropriate outcome of each Architecture Development Method (ADM) cycle is that the architecture output will extend or change the existing Architecture Landscape as required. This reflects the purpose of the ADM, which is a continuous process that adapts and evolves the architecture in response to changing business needs, requirements, and external factors.

As organizations progress through the ADM cycle, they reassess and redesign elements of their architectural landscape, ensuring that the architecture remains aligned with current and future goals. This iterative nature of the ADM enables not only the documentation of existing architectures but also the implementation of necessary modifications or enhancements, leading to a more robust and responsive architecture framework.

The other options do not align with the fundamental principles of the TOGAF framework. For example, suggesting that no significant changes will occur overlooks the dynamic nature of enterprise architecture development. Additionally, stating that the Architecture Landscape will only be documented or that outputs will solely reflect historical data fails to recognize the proactive approach of the ADM in driving meaningful change and ensuring that organizational architectures are aligned with evolving strategies and operational requirements.