What should be recorded in the Gap Analysis matrix when an ABB is available in both architectures?

In a Gap Analysis matrix, when an Architecture Building Block (ABB) is found to be available in both the baseline architecture and the target architecture, it indicates that this specific block is part of the architecture transition. Recording 'Included' in the intersecting cell reflects that the ABB is actively acknowledged and is being utilized in both phases.

This labeling shows that the ABB is considered relevant and necessary for both the current state and the desired future state of the architecture. It conveys alignment between the two architectural phases, which is crucial for understanding continuity and capacity building within the enterprise architecture framework.

Other options do not accurately represent the status of the ABB in this context. Marking it as 'Reviewed' does not specify its ongoing use in both architectures. Labeling it as 'Current' could imply an outdated status that doesn't capture its validity in the target architecture. Similarly, marking it as 'Approved' suggests a different context of validation rather than indicating actual inclusion in both architectures. Hence, 'Included' is the most precise choice that effectively communicates the ongoing relevance of the ABB.