Which characteristic defines the iterative nature of the ADM process?

The iterative nature of the Architecture Development Method (ADM) process is fundamentally characterized by its allowance for multiple revisits and refinements based on feedback. This approach recognizes that architecture is rarely a linear journey; instead, it thrives on an ongoing cycle of evaluation, adjustment, and improvement.

As architects develop their architecture, they can return to previous phases to refine and enhance their work as new insights, requirements, or stakeholder feedback emerge. This flexibility is crucial for adapting to changing business needs and ensures that the architecture remains relevant and effective throughout its lifecycle. By incorporating feedback at various stages, the process enhances collaboration among stakeholders and aligns the architecture more closely with the organization’s goals.

The other options present characteristics not aligned with the iterative nature of ADM. A single pass-through suggests a rigid, one-time approach that does not allow for further development, while a strict linear progression overlooks the dynamic interplay of various phases in the ADM. Lastly, emphasizing architect-initiated changes without stakeholder input contradicts the collaborative essence of ADM, which thrives on stakeholder engagement to inform and enhance architectural decisions.