Which statement best describes the ADM cycle?

The ADM (Architecture Development Method) cycle is best described as a continuous cycle of defining, designing, implementing, and governing an enterprise architecture. This characterizes the iterative nature of the ADM, which emphasizes that enterprise architecture is not a static set of documents or one-time efforts but rather an ongoing process that needs to adapt and evolve as the enterprise itself changes.

The ADM encourages regular reviews and iterations, allowing organizations to refine their architecture in response to changing business needs, technology advancements, or market conditions. By following a continuous cycle, stakeholders can ensure that the architecture remains relevant and effectively supports the organization’s objectives.

The other descriptions do not accurately capture the essence of the ADM. A linear series of steps suggests a straightforward, non-revisiting process that doesn’t allow for feedback or adjustments, which is contrary to the iterative approach of the ADM. A one-time sequence of project tasks ignores the need for ongoing governance and maintenance in enterprise architecture. Additionally, suggesting that the process is reserved for IT development overlooks the holistic view of architecture that includes business, information systems, and technology, thereby limiting its broader applicability across the organization.